Ludwig von Mises

Kinsella On Liberty

As many of my readers know, I often lecture and speak and give podcast or radio interviews on various libertarian topics and issues, such as intellectual property (IP), anarcho-libertarians, Austrian law and economic, contract theory, rights and punishment theory, and so on. I also blog and comment regularly on such matters in various blogs (primarily The Libertarian Standard, on general libertarian matters, and C4SIF, on IP-related matters), Facebook, and so on—often posting my take on a given issue in response to a question emailed to me or posted online.

This month I am launching a new podcast, Kinsella on Liberty. I expect to post episodes once or twice a week. The podcast will include new episodes covering  answers to questions emailed to me (feel free to ask me to address any issue of libertarian theory or application) as well as interviews or discussions I conduct with other libertarians. I’ll also include in the feed any new speeches or interviews of mine that appear on other podcasts or fora, as well as older speeches, interviews, and audio versions  of my articles, which  are collected for now on my media page). Audio and slides for several of my Mises Academy courses may also be found on my media page, and will also be included in the podcast feed later this year. Feel free to iTunesSubscribe in iTunes or RSSFollow with RSS, and spread the word to your libertarian friends. I welcome questions for possible coverage in the podcast, as well as any criticism, suggestions for improvement, or other feedback. My general approach to libertarian matters is Austrian, anarchist, and propertarian, influenced heavily by the thought of Ludwig von Mises, Murray N. Rothbard, and Hans-Hermann Hoppe. My writing can be found in articles here and blog posts at The Libertarian Standard and C4SIF, such as:

On IP in particular, which I’ll also cover from time to time in the podcast, see:

[C4SIF; SK; PFS]

{ 3 comments }

There are several useful bibliographies and recommended reading lists out there. See, e.g.:

I also published my own list, The Greatest Libertarian Books, a few years ago, and expanded on it in the post Top Ten Books of Liberty and Other Top Ten Lists of Libertarian Books..

Of the books I’ve read, I’d have to say the most important, significant, and influential one I’ve ever read is Hans-Hermann Hoppe, A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism. As I wrote in my LRC piece:

Topping my list is A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism, as well as a host of other works, by Hans-Hermann Hoppe, our greatest living intellectual. Hoppe’s other influential works include Democracy: The God That Failed, The Economics and Ethics of Private Property, and Economic Science and the Austrian Method. Sure, Hoppe stands on the shoulders of giants — primarily Mises and Rothbard — but to my mind his edifice of thought is the pinnacle of Austro-libertarian thinking. Somewhat sobering is the realization that Hoppe was only forty when he wrote Capitalism. Gulp.

This is one reason I did an extensive review essay of the The Economics and Ethics of Private Property, in 1994. And used it for my own theories, e.g. on rights, contract, IP, and the like. And conducted a whole Mises Academy course around Hoppe’s thought. TSC is systematic, lucid, dense, stimulating, and solidly anchored in Misesian praxeology and economics and Rothbardian political radicalism, while extending both. My copy is peppered with marginalia and notes. Such an amazing book. If you can only read part: Chapters 1, 2, and 7. But you must read the whole thing.

What are your favorites, more important, most influential?

{ 1 comment }

I was contacted recently by Fabrizio Sitzia, of the Italian libertarian group LibertariaNation.org, to do an interview on IP and libertarianism; we are doing this later this afternoon.

I was browsing around their site, which is in Italian but  noticed that there is an English language introduction to the group on their site here. There is also an interesting post on their site, New wave of libertarian intellectuals (Dec. 7, 2011) (google translation). The post notes the seminal influence of Mises and Rothbard (and Hoppe), and bemoans the very low prominence of libertarianism in Italy, and notes that the US is still the center of libertarian ideas and innovation. It also–flatteringly–highlights my work and that of my friend Stefan Molyneux–the two Stefs of libertarianism, I guess we might be called. Below is a rough automatic google translation of part of the post, with some light editing by me:

We often speak of the founders of the Austrian Economic School nearly so sacred. Rightly venerate Mises and Rothbard (to name but two) as our teachers and how our figures. It can not be thus seen that the grandeur of their thought and their works. But despite the themes of the Austrian school are universal and can be applied to any decade, century or millennium Mises and Rothbard were men of their time and did not know the problems that people face today. Perhaps the most insidious problems because more invisible than those of decades ago.

Compared to the Italian and the libertarian world for ideas and innovation is ridiculously set at zero (and perhaps also why we felt the need to establish libertariaNation) the U.S. is always evolving and always ready to tackle new issues. Among the young people I consider the most influential libertarian thinkers of my mind there are two that are little known to the Italian public, but I want you to know in this post: Stephan Kinsella and Stefan Molyneux.

Let’s start with Stephan Kinsella, the founder of Libertarian Papers and senior fellow at the Mises Institute, who is a lawyer specializing in intellectual property. And intellectual property is the topic of his best known book, Against Intellectual Property. As the title says the monograph has as its subject intellectual property and copyright. And in my opinion the book is a solid foundation against the arguments that defend copyright and patent, and especially against the libertarians who defend IP. Kinsella reminds us that Friedman and Rand, for example, have argued in favor of copyright despite the logical fallacy of their defense, especially within a libertarian framework. But the details of the book we will discuss later with a proper review. Kinsella, in my opinion, represents a modern libertarianism free from many of the artifacts of other past and contemporary libertarians. Together with Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Kinsella is definitely one of the most influential authors of the Mises Institute in recent years.

Stefan Molyneux is instead a completely different kind of libertarian. While Kinsella moves within the frame with academic essays, lectures, etc., and legal arguments, Molyneux is a real stage animal. The ‘ we saw the crowd to win Libertopia 2011 and we hear every day on FreedomainRadio. In his own channel on Youtube addresses topics as diverse as state-worship by the copyright laws, reviews books and science fiction films to interviews with famous people libertarians. I like Molyneux because he has a way of making direct points, does not mince words, and especially has no degree in Economics. Thanks to these characteristics Molyneux can reach a wider audience than a book of Mises or Rothbard could ever do. He also has new ideas, and even when he speaks of the masters Mises and Rothbard he always manages to fit perfectly with our times. He rarely  uses the patriotic rhetoric of stars and stripes, simply because he is a Canadian. A character like this, a haranguing crowds of this caliber does not exist in Italy and perhaps even in Europe. The spread of libertarianism and the philosophy of non-aggression principle must necessarily come from people of this type. These are just two of the representatives of what some jokingly call the New Wave of Libertarian Intellectuals. The first “wave” was represented by the economists of the Austrian School and is the foundation of libertarian theory. Now it is time for someone to bring them out from the halls of universities and make known to the general public.

{ 2 comments }

Nice article in Investor’s Business Daily on Mises, which quotes extensively from TLS blogger Jeff Tucker and Austrians Bettina Bien Greaves and Mark Thornton:

Let Free Markets Work, Said Ludwig Von Mises

By PETER BENESH, FOR INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY Posted 12/13/2011 01:47 PM ET

Ludwig von Mises was born in Ukraine, studied in Vienna, fought in World War I, and in 1940 landed in America, where he lectured and wrote books.Ludwig von Mises was born in Ukraine, studied in Vienna, fought in World War I, and in 1940 landed in America, where he lectured and wrote books. View Enlarged Image

If he were around today to see the economic mess in the U.S. and Europe, Ludwig von Mises would be entitled to a big, fat “I told you so.”

Mises held that whenever government tinkers with the economy, especially the money supply, it screws things up.

Natural market forces do a better job of ironing out inflation, ending a recession and boosting employment, he said and wrote.

Though he lived to age 92, from his birth in 1881 in what is now Ukraine to his death in 1973 in New York City, Mises never drew the plaudits he deserved, says Jeffrey Tucker, executive editor of Laissez Faire Books, a libertarian publisher and bookseller owned by financial forecasting firm Agora Financial.

“Mises deserves every bit as much recognition as his contemporary, Albert Einstein,” Tucker told IBD.

Read more>>

{ 0 comments }

Economist Brad DeLong has come out swinging against Austrian economics again, and once again he’s punched himself in the face. But he’s too numb to realize it. There’s a great response on the Mises Economics Blog by Jonathan Catalán, and I take a stab on my site, Wirkman Netizen.

It’s interesting that neither Catalán nor I attack, in our respective longer efforts, the worst calumny of DeLong’s, his insinuation that the Austrian distrust of fiat money comes down to anti-Semitism: “[I]n its scarier moments this train of thought slides over to: ‘good German engineers (and workers); bad Jewish financiers.’”

Since Mises was a Jew, and was treated badly for anti-Semitic reasons at times — why does DeLong think Mises left Austria? — and that  Mises never, ever supported anti-Semitism (nor did Hayek, for that matter), this is especially vile. It’s just another example of those leaning left (which means: technocrats who mislabel themselves as “liberals” and “progressives”) playing the racism/anti-semitism card when they lack a good hand.

DeLong should be ashamed of himself. But, then, one of the perks of being in the managerial class of the technocratic state means never having to say you are sorry.

 

{ 1 comment }