The Libertarian Standard » Editor http://libertarianstandard.com Property - Prosperity - Peace Sun, 09 Nov 2014 19:26:44 +0000 en-US hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1 A new website and group blog of radical Austro-libertarians, shining the light of reason on truth and justice. The Libertarian Standard clean The Libertarian Standard thelibertarianstandard@gmail.com thelibertarianstandard@gmail.com (The Libertarian Standard) CC-BY Property - Prosperity - Peace libertarianism, anarchism, capitalism, free markets, liberty, private property, rights, Mises, Rothbard, Rand, antiwar, freedom The Libertarian Standard » Editor http://libertarianstandard.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/rss_default.jpg http://libertarianstandard.com TV-G Article: Voluntary Governance http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/11/14/article-voluntary-governance/ http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/11/14/article-voluntary-governance/#comments Mon, 15 Nov 2010 05:50:56 +0000 http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=7129 The standard nomenclature of libertarianism and anarchy suffer the double disadvantage of counter-productive cultural baggage and the factual stigma of being at best unclear and at worst inaccurate. Adopting, instead, the language of ‘voluntary governance’ has a triple advantage. It is a convivial language which doesn’t scare people and turn them off of our arguments before we’ve even made them. It is simply a more accurate description of our desired objective. And, given the actual state of affairs, it not only describes our ends, but also points toward the most promising means of getting to the desired outcome. In other words, ‘voluntary governance’ is not only rhetorically more convivial and substantively accurate, but also transitionally facilitating.

Michael McConkey lives in the socialist hotbed of Vancouver, Canada, where the mountains continually remind him of how puny are the grand designs of the state’s social engineers. He has a Ph.D. in communication from McGill University in Montreal and free lances in teaching organizational theory. He’s just finishing a book that aspires to reinvent communications theory through the application of Austrian and libertarian ideas to a discipline that has been painfully positivist and anti-market.

Read the Full Article by Michael McConkey

Afterwards, discuss it below.

]]>
http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/11/14/article-voluntary-governance/feed/ 8
Article: What Is To Be Done? — A Comment on Angelo Codevilla’s “Ruling Class” http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/11/07/article-what-is-to-be-done-a-comment-on-angelo-codevillas-ruling-class/ http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/11/07/article-what-is-to-be-done-a-comment-on-angelo-codevillas-ruling-class/#comments Mon, 08 Nov 2010 05:48:07 +0000 http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=7060 In his paper “America’s Ruling Class – and the Perils of Revolution” Professor Angelo Codevilla offers an excellent analysis of the causes and forms of government encroachment into the basic traditional liberties of Americans, and a very good sketch of the reasons why big government ideology succeeded in imposing its tenets upon the country, despite overwhelming opposition by Americans. The problem America faces, according to him, is nothing less than a complete usurpation of power by an alienated elite: the ideologues of big government and the politicians that work in concert to subvert the structure of the American constitution, and to rule over the great majority of Americans against their will. Professor Codevilla paints a very grim (and very true) picture of the complete breakdown of the constitutional form of government in America, under the assault of the modern statist ideology, delivered in a bipartisan manner, and garnered with political corruption. But he fails to provide prescriptions radical enough to deal with the problem, perhaps because he too is a member of that big-government-worshiping elite.

Ivan Jankovic is a graduate student of Political Science at the University of Windsor, Canada. Originally from Serbia, he has published in the fields of Austrian economics, public choice, and classical liberal philosophy.

Read the Full Article by Ivan Jankovic

Afterwards, discuss it below.

]]>
http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/11/07/article-what-is-to-be-done-a-comment-on-angelo-codevillas-ruling-class/feed/ 0
Article: Healthcare Is Not a Human Right http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/10/18/article-healthcare-is-not-a-human-right/ http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/10/18/article-healthcare-is-not-a-human-right/#comments Tue, 19 Oct 2010 03:49:36 +0000 http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=6684 Of all the arguments favoring the coordination and control of the healthcare industry by the central planning agency of the state, the healthcare-is-a-human-right argument seems to be the most convincing one, even to those who may favor a free market approach to the problem of coordination of scarce health resources. How can we as a society possibly deny healthcare to someone in need? Shouldn’t the state assume that task?

Gabriel E. Vidal is the chief operating officer of a hospital system in the United States. He has a BA in politics, philosophy, and economics and an MBA in finance.

Read the Full Article by Gabriel E. Vidal

Afterwards, discuss it below.

]]>
http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/10/18/article-healthcare-is-not-a-human-right/feed/ 8
Article: Intent is Like Remorse http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/09/04/article-intent-is-like-remorse/ http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/09/04/article-intent-is-like-remorse/#comments Sat, 04 Sep 2010 05:30:06 +0000 http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=4951 The argument of this article is that intent, like remorse, is irrelevant to restitution. By default, intent, like any other subjective value judgment,  should play the role of a restitution-discount variable determined by the victim of an aggressive act, not the arbitration company.

Jeremiah Dyke is an adjunct math professor and a libertarian writer. Feel free to contact him at jeremiahdyke@gmail.com or through his website http://jeremiahdyke.blogspot.com/.

Read the Full Article by Jeremiah Dyke

Afterwards, discuss it below.

]]>
http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/09/04/article-intent-is-like-remorse/feed/ 2
Article: What Libertarians Should Learn From Radical Socialists http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/08/31/article-what-libertarians-should-learn-from-radical-socialists/ http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/08/31/article-what-libertarians-should-learn-from-radical-socialists/#comments Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:00:55 +0000 http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=4836 Ross Kenyon analyzes the radical socialist movement of the Progressive Era in an attempt to discern why they failed and how libertarians can learn from their failures in order to create the ideal libertarian society today.

Ross Kenyon is a news analyst with the Center for a Stateless Society and a senior at Arizona State University, where he is majoring in American History and is a member of the ASU Students For Liberty leadership team.

Read the Full Article by Ross Kenyon

Afterwards, discuss it below.

GJA5QE4ZF9YK

]]>
http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/08/31/article-what-libertarians-should-learn-from-radical-socialists/feed/ 1
Article: A Manifesto of the Private Property Anarchists http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/08/06/article-a-manifesto-of-the-private-property-anarchists/ http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/08/06/article-a-manifesto-of-the-private-property-anarchists/#comments Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:10:55 +0000 http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=3908 Many are likely to at least partly subscribe to the philosophical ideal of individual liberty that is at the heart of private property anarchism but still think that the application of private property anarchist ideology to society would necessarily lead to chaos.

However, when the private property anarchist talks about leveling government, he is referring to the multitude of entities that infringe upon property rights, and disposing of all such entities and preventing them from reemerging would not only not create chaos, but would effect the very opposite outcome of restoring and maintaining perpetual order, peace, and prosperity forever.

Kevin Cornell is currently studying to get a B.S. degree in Liberal Studies from Southern Connecticut State University.

Read the Full Article by Kevin W. Cornell

Afterwards, discuss it below.

]]>
http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/08/06/article-a-manifesto-of-the-private-property-anarchists/feed/ 7
Article: Seeking Heaven http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/06/28/article-seeking-heaven/ http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/06/28/article-seeking-heaven/#comments Tue, 29 Jun 2010 01:40:30 +0000 http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=2826 This short story, by Anita Acavalos, was inspired by the WWI poetry of Wilfred Owen, namely “Dulce et Decorum Es” and “Anthem for Doomed Youth.”

Read the Full Story by Anita Acavalos

Afterwards, discuss it below.

]]>
http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/06/28/article-seeking-heaven/feed/ 0
Article: The Property And Freedom Society — Reflections After Five Years http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/06/10/article-the-property-and-freedom-society-reflections-after-five-years/ http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/06/10/article-the-property-and-freedom-society-reflections-after-five-years/#comments Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:03:14 +0000 http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=2311 This article is an edited version of Professor Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s opening address to the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Property and Freedom Society (PFS) held in Bodrum, Turkey at the Hotel Karia Princess, June 3-7, 2010. The address provides an insightful overview of various libertarian alliances and strategies over past decades, including the paleo-libertarian/paleo-conservative alliance, and reasons for its failure. Hoppe illustrates how the state has coopted even most free market think tanks into serving the state’s aims, because they are not radical enough and their principal addressee is the central government. Hoppe argues (a) that libertarians must not put their trust in politicians or get distracted by politics and (b) using the case of Pat Buchanan as an example, that it is impossible to have a lasting intellectual association with people (such as some conservatives) who are either unwilling or incapable of grasping the principles of economics.

In view of these insights and this history, Hoppe surveys the brief history of the PFS and sets out its basic purposes.

Read the Full Article by Hans-Hermann Hoppe

Afterwards, discuss the article below.

]]>
http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/06/10/article-the-property-and-freedom-society-reflections-after-five-years/feed/ 11
The War on Nutrition http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/04/24/the-war-on-nutrition/ http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/04/24/the-war-on-nutrition/#comments Sat, 24 Apr 2010 14:18:13 +0000 http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=1204 Slate writer Melinda Wenner Moyer makes a big to-do over new mainstream medical-research findings that suggest that saturated fats affect your blood-cholesterol levels in ways that don’t really hurt you, while processed sugars affect your blood-cholesterol levels in ways that do hurt you.  I agree with Moyer that the topic is something over which it is worthwhile to make a big to-do.  The bottom line:  LDL (“bad, bad”) cholesterol comes in a variety of flavors, distinguished by the sizes of the particles in your blood.  Big LDL particles — those you get from eating fatty meat — seem not to attach to artery walls; those are the heart-neutral particles.  Small and medium LDL particles — the ones you get into your blood by eating processed sugars and flours — do appear to attach to artery walls and contribute to heart disease.

The knowledge that processed carbohydrates lead to problems with blood cholesterol isn’t new, however.  Dr. Sheldon Reiser published studies showing that processed-carb intake raises LDL and triglyceride levels back in 1983.  (You’ll have to visit a library to find this:  “Physiological Differences between Starches and Sugars,” in Medical Applications of Clinical Nutrition pp. 133-177, ed. By J. Bland, Keats Pub. New Canaan, CN, 1983.)

I’ve known how to eat well for years, but recently have set aside the time and developed the motivation to really do it.  What occurred to me while I was shopping:  My wife and I are now shopping mostly for meats (including fish), cheeses, nuts, and a huge variety of fresh produce.  In other words, the “radical” healthy diets some of us are eating, including the “paleo” diet, remind me of what my grandmother ate (though our grandparents didn’t know to avoid bread, especially white bread).  Of course, we’re avoiding processed foods, which everybody has known to do for decades.

So, what’s the federal government to do?  Government officials have been waging war on our meat and fat intake for years, most recently with the updated food pyramid (the one from 2005, due to be updated this year) that calls for six or more servings of grain (only half of them whole grain), and only two of meat, per day — a diet likely to make anyone but a marathon runner gain body fat and tiny-bit LDL.  Knowing that the 2005 pyramid is already obsolete, is there any reason to trust the next one, or any reason to trust that the government’s new war on salt is any more credible?

The final answer:  Don’t trust the government’s war on nutrition (ostensibly a war on bad nutrition) any more than its wars on inflation, unemployment, drugs, or terrorism.  Inform yourself, take control of your own health, and enjoy a long and healthy life in spite of the government’s attempts to help.

]]>
http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/04/24/the-war-on-nutrition/feed/ 0
The NOPD Is “Troubled” http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/04/16/the-nopd-is-troubled/ http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/04/16/the-nopd-is-troubled/#comments Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:08:14 +0000 http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=1027 Federal assistant AG Thomas Perez is considering filing a “pattern or practice” lawsuit against the New Orleans Police Department as a result of all the killings and coverups perpetrated by that department since Katrina.  Due to niceties in federal law, such a suit, if won by the feds, would effectively allow the Justice Department to determine how the NOPD runs for a while.

What I find most interesting in the coverage of the story, though, is this:  Even though Perez wants to take over the NOPD because of a lengthy and recent record of police killings of innocent people and ensuing cover-ups, Perez still can’t bring himself to call the NOPD “corrupt,” “malignant,” “evil,” or even “dangerous.”  Perez and a New Orleans defense attorney (!) refer to the NOPD as “troubled,” which moniker the rest of us use to describe a rebellious and unhappy, but otherwise harmless, teenager.

I’m guessing that Perez and the defense attorney avoid stronger language partly instinctively in the avoidance of incurring personal liability (a habit lawyers learn quickly), and partly to avoid shaking our faith in government itself — political correctness at its most transparent.  But it makes me wonder:  If killing the people they’ve sworn “to protect and serve” earns a police department the label “troubled,” what must it take for these folks to refer to a department as “corrupt”?

]]>
http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/04/16/the-nopd-is-troubled/feed/ 0