Comments on: Was Hitler Really Anti-Gun Control?

By: Weasel wrangler

Weasel wrangler — Fri, 05 Apr 2013 21:26:51 +0000

George:

In a police state who controls the sale of any type of firearm? The Hitler Youth used 22 caliber weapons which were not controlled under Versailles as they were not considered nor are today military weapons. Further the 1938 laws were very strict in prohibiting any number of potential opposition groups such as Catholic youth groups, unions, hunting clubs from obtaining weapons let alone ammunition. You apparently understand German I suggest you read the 1938 laws which are available if you conduct a Google search.

By: Weasel wrangler

Weasel wrangler — Fri, 05 Apr 2013 21:22:22 +0000

Steve thank you for allowing those Americans who believe in the Constitution permission to loeave. Now can you tell us what other parts of the Bill of Rights you find cinstrain you so that you cannot abide them. Commissar Obama has stated this as well.

I do wonder why you stay in this country since you cannot understand nor agree with the Constitution. If you ever bothered to learn it.

By: Weasel wrangler

Weasel wrangler — Fri, 05 Apr 2013 21:17:54 +0000

Criminals and mentally challenged people as defined by the state? Are you familiar with the Soviet use of mental asylums, for those who opposed the regime were obviously crazy. I note that the progressives here are following the same tactic. The author no doubt aspires to work for Pravada or at the minimum MSNBC. But with reasoning skills and an education perhaps he should aim at the Democratic Underground.

Perhaps you can provide evidence of Hitler allowing free unrestricted gun ownership. We know all police states encourage this. Surely this would pose no challenge to such a giant intellect such as yours?

By: Weasel wrangler

Weasel wrangler — Fri, 05 Apr 2013 21:13:37 +0000

Police states do not allow their citizens to own weapons. In 1938 Hitler insured no opposition groups could own guns. So your point is?

By: Weasel wrangler

Weasel wrangler — Fri, 05 Apr 2013 21:11:47 +0000

Ex-Army:

So you were a member of the Red Liberation Army? No need to ask your MOS because of course you couldn’t respond. Having disposed of that fabrication anyone who believes Hitler was pro guns demonstrates his qual;ifications to run for Barney Franl’s seat or substitute for a turnip.

Its sad to see someonepost such a delusional comment.

By: Weasel wrangler

Weasel wrangler — Fri, 05 Apr 2013 21:08:52 +0000

Nice points. The author is obvious in his agenda and loose with his facts. The 1938 laws were very strict in prohibiting gun ownership to anyone that might oppose the National Socialists. Have a familiar ring to it?

By: Weasel wrangler

Weasel wrangler — Fri, 05 Apr 2013 21:06:25 +0000

You nailed Darian. What a moron.

By: pryhs

pryhs — Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:25:30 +0000

This article doesn’t address mandatory registration, which made control possible. Hitler convinced the German populace that Jews were the problem; like Obama is trying to convince America that constitutional conservatives are the problem. Balkanize and conquer.

By: pryhs

pryhs — Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:04:15 +0000

2/3 of both houses of congress or 2/3 of state legislatures must propose the amendment (to repeal); then it must be approved by 3/4 of the state legislatures. In other words, it ain’t happening.

By: Anthony Gregory

Anthony Gregory — Sat, 23 Mar 2013 14:51:36 +0000

Kelly, I agree, that’s why this whole article is a criticism of that argument. If you read the sentence again, you’ll my point, perhaps:

“Honing in on the gun rights issue, we see a most curious argument: Hitler was actually pro-gun rights—except for the minor issue of the Jews.”