<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Unipartisanship is the new bipartisanship</title> <atom:link href="http://libertarianstandard.com/2012/11/30/unipartisanship-is-the-new-bipartisanship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2012/11/30/unipartisanship-is-the-new-bipartisanship/</link> <description>Property - Prosperity - Peace</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:54:19 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: geoih</title><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2012/11/30/unipartisanship-is-the-new-bipartisanship/#comment-2894</link> <dc:creator>geoih</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 13:11:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=12079#comment-2894</guid> <description><![CDATA[&quot;... foreign policy and war remains a valid function of the State.&quot;Corruption and murder remain valid functions of the state. Now there&#039;s a principled argument people can get behind.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; foreign policy and war remains a valid function of the State.&#8221;</p><p>Corruption and murder remain valid functions of the state. Now there&#8217;s a principled argument people can get behind.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pete McAlpine</title><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2012/11/30/unipartisanship-is-the-new-bipartisanship/#comment-2890</link> <dc:creator>Pete McAlpine</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 23:55:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=12079#comment-2890</guid> <description><![CDATA[What spoils this &quot;moral equivalence&quot; of left and right which has grown so &quot;knee-jerk&quot; amongst libertarians is that, until anarcho-capitalists have something other that blather to replace State foreign policy, foreign policy and war remains a valid function of the State.  The rights tries to fulfill this function, often poorly.  The LEFT is just totalitarian and takes every opportunity for expanded government.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What spoils this &#8220;moral equivalence&#8221; of left and right which has grown so &#8220;knee-jerk&#8221; amongst libertarians is that, until anarcho-capitalists have something other that blather to replace State foreign policy, foreign policy and war remains a valid function of the State.  The rights tries to fulfill this function, often poorly.  The LEFT is just totalitarian and takes every opportunity for expanded government.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ricketson</title><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2012/11/30/unipartisanship-is-the-new-bipartisanship/#comment-2888</link> <dc:creator>ricketson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 03:33:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=12079#comment-2888</guid> <description><![CDATA[&quot; assuming (as is often the case) it receives widespread support, the right becomes less vociferous about repealing the law. &quot;Isn&#039;t this how a representative government SHOULD work? It&#039;s one thing when a party runs on a particular platform, wins, and then reverses it&#039;s position. It&#039;s totally different if the party modifies its platform after losing.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; assuming (as is often the case) it receives widespread support, the right becomes less vociferous about repealing the law. &#8221;</p><p>Isn&#8217;t this how a representative government SHOULD work? It&#8217;s one thing when a party runs on a particular platform, wins, and then reverses it&#8217;s position. It&#8217;s totally different if the party modifies its platform after losing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>