Friday, September 21, 2012

No.

Contrary to the hyperbole of the blogosphere, this year neither the US nor China will burn to the ground in some grotesque fashion.

No the Chinese yuan (RMB) is not taking over the international markets (it accounts for a mere 0.6% of letter-of-credit transactions), no there is no concerted war on the USD.  In fact, despite incredulous hypotheticals to the contrary, China is still buying US treasuries.  The RMB has also depreciated relative to the USD.

Exaggerations sell and exaggerating more than the next Joe is even more sellable (sic).   Or  as Matt Ridley wrote in a recent Wired piece, many westerners have become apocaholics.

There won’t be a nuclear exchange between the US and China or China and Japan (the Chinese arsenal by the way, is overstated and exaggerated by the same hawks that brought us the second Iraq wars).  In fact, Bill Gertz, among others is flat out wrong regarding his assertions of China’s secret nuclear stockpile.

In fact, despite a concerted effort by the CCP and state media (like Xinhua) to paint Japan (and the US) as foreign devils, there probably will not be any military confrontation between China and Japan.  In part because there is approximately $350 billion in bilateral trade and also, for what Bill Bishop has recently written: cooler heads on both sides want a dialogue.   Similarly, never in the history of the modern world have the two largest trading partners, let alone the two largest economies, gone to war with one another.

Or in other words, US and Chinese businesses would not want to torpedo their cargo ships, bomb their own factories, blow up their employees, burn their shareholders, decimate the infrastructure that provides electricity, water and telecommunication services to their retail stores and/or otherwise destroy their property.  (As an aside, to assuage those electoral fears of a purported Chinese invasion: the Chinese military complex can’t even make decent jet engines yet, what jets will protect this phantom invasion fleet?)

Pandemonium might be the lucid dream of certain bloggers who enjoy hyping a story but wishful thinking is of course, fallacious at best.

What problems will China face internally?

[Keep reading…]

{ 0 comments }

I have never understood the popular infatuation with Ernesto “Che” Guevara, the Argentine-born Marxist revolutionary who instigated socialist revolts in three countries, or why people would want to wear clothing emblazoned with his face.  The man was a mass murderer, after all, and the architect (along with Fidel Castro) of the communist police state that rules Cuba to this day.  Unless one believes murder, wealth seizure and destruction, and the abrogation of civil liberties are justified means to political ends, why would anyone want to celebrate a person who engaged in all of these atrocities?

Thor Halvorssen, founder of the Human Rights Foundation, doesn’t understand it either, and in an open letter to Urban Outfitters published on Huffington Post this week, he questions the company’s reasons for offering Che-themed merchandise:

Although Guevara’s image has appeared on countless items for consumption over the last few decades as a symbol of change for the better, Guevara’s actual record is that of a brutal tyrant who suppressed individual freedom in Cuba and murdered those who challenged his worldview.

Guevara undoubtedly played a key role in the overthrow of the dictatorial Batista regime in January of 1959. However, despite promises of a new democratic government, within a few months he and Fidel Castro had designed and installed a full-blown police state that deprived the overwhelming majority of Cuban citizens of democracy and human rights.

From 1959 to 1960, the new government carried out summary executions of at least 1,118 people by firing squad. Guevara himself presided over the notorious La Cabaña prison, where hundreds of the executions took place. For comparison’s sake, the Batista regime was responsible for 747 noncombatant deaths between 1952 and 1959. The Cuban revolution under the direction of Guevara also saw the rise of forced labor camps which gave way a few years later to full-scale concentration camps. These were filled with dissidents, homosexuals, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Afro-Cuban priests, and anyone else who had committed “crimes” against the new moral revolution.

Note: it appears that Urban Outfitters no longer carries the poster that prompted Halvorssen’s letter.

It’s not just Urban Outfitters, of course; many companies over the decades have offered Che’s mug on everything from key chains to jackets to backpacks, snapped up primarily by college kids who dig the rebellious motif, or by hipsters who appreciate the irony of a leftist revolutionary icon being used to enrich filthy capitalist pigs.  Either way, Halvorssen’s letter is a welcome reality check.

Just so long as they don’t start selling Obama T-shirts.

{ 4 comments }