<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Is an involuntary samaritan good? And can libertarians support a &#8220;good samaritan&#8221; law?</title> <atom:link href="http://libertarianstandard.com/2012/02/22/is-an-involuntary-samaritan-good-and-can-libertarians-support-a-good-samaritan-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2012/02/22/is-an-involuntary-samaritan-good-and-can-libertarians-support-a-good-samaritan-law/</link> <description>Property - Prosperity - Peace</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:54:19 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: jack</title><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2012/02/22/is-an-involuntary-samaritan-good-and-can-libertarians-support-a-good-samaritan-law/#comment-2508</link> <dc:creator>jack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 08:21:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=10532#comment-2508</guid> <description><![CDATA[I believe his main point is to establish the minimal moral obligation.  Now that we all agree that there is said obligation then anyone not saving the child is leaving it up to others to perform the duty that she herself admitted was a moral obligation.Redistribution has independent lines of arguments, but insofar as the number of drowning children increase (or starving poor) then those who do not fulfill their duty that everyone recognizes as an obligation, they are free-riding off the duty of others.  This is how enforceable action would arise:   We all agree that we have minimal moral duties which have minimal infringements of our liberties (like wet shoes), so to avoid free-riders, we tax.  In the world where there were no freeriders, no tax is necessary.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe his main point is to establish the minimal moral obligation.  Now that we all agree that there is said obligation then anyone not saving the child is leaving it up to others to perform the duty that she herself admitted was a moral obligation.</p><p>Redistribution has independent lines of arguments, but insofar as the number of drowning children increase (or starving poor) then those who do not fulfill their duty that everyone recognizes as an obligation, they are free-riding off the duty of others.  This is how enforceable action would arise:   We all agree that we have minimal moral duties which have minimal infringements of our liberties (like wet shoes), so to avoid free-riders, we tax.  In the world where there were no freeriders, no tax is necessary.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Geoffrey Allan Plauché</title><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2012/02/22/is-an-involuntary-samaritan-good-and-can-libertarians-support-a-good-samaritan-law/#comment-2480</link> <dc:creator>Geoffrey Allan Plauché</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 04:30:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=10532#comment-2480</guid> <description><![CDATA[Sorry. I don&#039;t see your comment in the moderation queue. If it was there, I&#039;d release it into the wild.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. I don&#8217;t see your comment in the moderation queue. If it was there, I&#8217;d release it into the wild.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: geoih</title><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2012/02/22/is-an-involuntary-samaritan-good-and-can-libertarians-support-a-good-samaritan-law/#comment-2476</link> <dc:creator>geoih</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:17:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=10532#comment-2476</guid> <description><![CDATA[I was going to make a comment supporting your post, but apparently your automated comment filter thought my comment was too insignificant to allow. So, instead I&#039;ll simply make this complaint about that.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to make a comment supporting your post, but apparently your automated comment filter thought my comment was too insignificant to allow. So, instead I&#8217;ll simply make this complaint about that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>