<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thomas Jefferson&#8217;s Proposal to Limit the Length of Patent and Copyright in the Bill of Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://libertarianstandard.com/2011/12/01/thomas-jeffersons-proposal-to-limit-the-length-of-patent-and-copyright-in-the-bill-of-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2011/12/01/thomas-jeffersons-proposal-to-limit-the-length-of-patent-and-copyright-in-the-bill-of-rights/</link>
	<description>Property - Prosperity - Peace</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 04:59:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Internet Has Changed Everything &#171; The Blogirhythm Network</title>
		<link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2011/12/01/thomas-jeffersons-proposal-to-limit-the-length-of-patent-and-copyright-in-the-bill-of-rights/#comment-2983</link>
		<dc:creator>The Internet Has Changed Everything &#171; The Blogirhythm Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=9862#comment-2983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Even Thomas Jefferson thought patent and copyright laws were a little extraneous in their current st..., and fought very hard to get a Bill of Rights amendment in the Constitution to alleviate the long restriction on copyrighted documents. If one is a writer or a musician or an artist, they rarely ever get into the art form for the money. It&#8217;s about getting their name and their message out there. The suits, the corporate holders, and the powers that be are the ones that want the money. The publishers and the record producers. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Even Thomas Jefferson thought patent and copyright laws were a little extraneous in their current st&#8230;, and fought very hard to get a Bill of Rights amendment in the Constitution to alleviate the long restriction on copyrighted documents. If one is a writer or a musician or an artist, they rarely ever get into the art form for the money. It&#8217;s about getting their name and their message out there. The suits, the corporate holders, and the powers that be are the ones that want the money. The publishers and the record producers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeaceRequiresAnarchy</title>
		<link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2011/12/01/thomas-jeffersons-proposal-to-limit-the-length-of-patent-and-copyright-in-the-bill-of-rights/#comment-2822</link>
		<dc:creator>PeaceRequiresAnarchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 15:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=9862#comment-2822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we have right to use three things separately, I see nothing in reason or in the law, which forbids our using them all together. A man has a right to use a saw, an axe, a plane, separately; may he not combine their uses on the same piece of wood? He has a right to use his knife to cut his meat, a fork to hold it; may a patentee take from him the right to combine their use on the same subject?

If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it.

Its peculiar character, too, is that no one possesses the less, because every other possesses the whole of it.

He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.

That ideas should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man, and improvement of his condition, seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over all space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe, move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation.

Inventions then cannot, in nature, be a subject of property.

– Thomas Jefferson  ( http://praxeology.net/anticopyright.htm )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we have right to use three things separately, I see nothing in reason or in the law, which forbids our using them all together. A man has a right to use a saw, an axe, a plane, separately; may he not combine their uses on the same piece of wood? He has a right to use his knife to cut his meat, a fork to hold it; may a patentee take from him the right to combine their use on the same subject?</p>
<p>If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it.</p>
<p>Its peculiar character, too, is that no one possesses the less, because every other possesses the whole of it.</p>
<p>He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.</p>
<p>That ideas should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man, and improvement of his condition, seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over all space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe, move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation.</p>
<p>Inventions then cannot, in nature, be a subject of property.</p>
<p>– Thomas Jefferson  ( <a href="http://praxeology.net/anticopyright.htm" rel="nofollow">http://praxeology.net/anticopyright.htm</a> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manuel Lora</title>
		<link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2011/12/01/thomas-jeffersons-proposal-to-limit-the-length-of-patent-and-copyright-in-the-bill-of-rights/#comment-2218</link>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Lora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 22:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=9862#comment-2218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fantastic find here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic find here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk

 Served from: libertarianstandard.com @ 2013-06-18 23:22:13 by W3 Total Cache -->