<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh The Things (And People) I Own!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://libertarianstandard.com/2011/11/16/oh-the-things-and-people-i-own/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2011/11/16/oh-the-things-and-people-i-own/</link>
	<description>Property - Prosperity - Peace</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 04:59:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan Kinsella</title>
		<link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2011/11/16/oh-the-things-and-people-i-own/#comment-2167</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Kinsella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=9507#comment-2167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another one is &quot;the government&quot;--used by centralist libertarians to paper over the difference between state and federal government, and the constitutional limits on federal power. So for example if the feds refuse to strike down a bad state law, perhaps because the court recognizes limits on federal power are not limits on state power and are certainly not &lt;i&gt;grants&lt;/i&gt; of power to the federal courts to review state law, then the centralist libertarian says &quot;that decision was wrong because it says the government can do X.&quot; Like in the Kelo case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another one is &#8220;the government&#8221;&#8211;used by centralist libertarians to paper over the difference between state and federal government, and the constitutional limits on federal power. So for example if the feds refuse to strike down a bad state law, perhaps because the court recognizes limits on federal power are not limits on state power and are certainly not <i>grants</i> of power to the federal courts to review state law, then the centralist libertarian says &#8220;that decision was wrong because it says the government can do X.&#8221; Like in the Kelo case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk

 Served from: libertarianstandard.com @ 2013-06-18 23:56:38 by W3 Total Cache -->