<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Is Paul Krugman stupid, or just dishonest?</title> <atom:link href="http://libertarianstandard.com/2011/09/26/is-paul-krugman-stupid-or-just-dishonest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2011/09/26/is-paul-krugman-stupid-or-just-dishonest/</link> <description>Property - Prosperity - Peace</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:54:19 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: Brian Martinez</title><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2011/09/26/is-paul-krugman-stupid-or-just-dishonest/#comment-2185</link> <dc:creator>Brian Martinez</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:05:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=9225#comment-2185</guid> <description><![CDATA[heubler, in what way was Enron not held accountable?  The company went out of business once it lost shareholder confidence and its stock crashed.  And several of its leaders faced criminal prosecution.  Even their auditor Arthur Andersen went out of business as a result of the scandal.  Those are pretty harsh penalties for cooking the books.But when does that ever happen when public bureaucrats waste hundreds of millions or even billions of taxpayer dollars?  If the market could treat the Department of Energy the same way the government treated Enron, it would abolish the department and put Steven Chu on trial.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heubler, in what way was Enron not held accountable?  The company went out of business once it lost shareholder confidence and its stock crashed.  And several of its leaders faced criminal prosecution.  Even their auditor Arthur Andersen went out of business as a result of the scandal.  Those are pretty harsh penalties for cooking the books.</p><p>But when does that ever happen when public bureaucrats waste hundreds of millions or even billions of taxpayer dollars?  If the market could treat the Department of Energy the same way the government treated Enron, it would abolish the department and put Steven Chu on trial.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: heubler</title><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2011/09/26/is-paul-krugman-stupid-or-just-dishonest/#comment-2184</link> <dc:creator>heubler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:15:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=9225#comment-2184</guid> <description><![CDATA[&quot;It isn’t that private equity is never lost in business ventures.  It’s that there’s a level of accountability when it happens.&quot;Enron?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It isn’t that private equity is never lost in business ventures.  It’s that there’s a level of accountability when it happens.&#8221;</p><p>Enron?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: heubler</title><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2011/09/26/is-paul-krugman-stupid-or-just-dishonest/#comment-2183</link> <dc:creator>heubler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:11:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=9225#comment-2183</guid> <description><![CDATA[&quot;The big difference is that in government, politicians and bureaucrats decide how to spend and risk other people’s money without their consent. In private enterprise, people consent to the level of risk they take when they invest.&quot;My last boss withheld my 401 k contributions, for over two years, and used the money for operating expenses.  Now the company has been sold, because he was able to use those funds stolen from me and other employees to make the company seem more profitable than it was.  Laws that might hold him accountable are so weak, as to be functionally useless.In private enterprise, things aren&#039;t always what they seem, and people don&#039;t always give consent to what corporate bosses force them into.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The big difference is that in government, politicians and bureaucrats decide how to spend and risk other people’s money without their consent. In private enterprise, people consent to the level of risk they take when they invest.&#8221;</p><p>My last boss withheld my 401 k contributions, for over two years, and used the money for operating expenses.  Now the company has been sold, because he was able to use those funds stolen from me and other employees to make the company seem more profitable than it was.  Laws that might hold him accountable are so weak, as to be functionally useless.</p><p>In private enterprise, things aren&#8217;t always what they seem, and people don&#8217;t always give consent to what corporate bosses force them into.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WhiskeyJim</title><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2011/09/26/is-paul-krugman-stupid-or-just-dishonest/#comment-2139</link> <dc:creator>WhiskeyJim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:14:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=9225#comment-2139</guid> <description><![CDATA[Brian, I believe you missed an additional difference which makes the Solyndra fiasco worse.The federal government loaned Solyndra money primarily BECAUSE private equity would not.Solyndra could not longer tempt private capital. Numerous potential private investors stepped forward to say that 10 minutes with Solyndra&#039;s prospectus was all that was needed to see why their offering failed. That the government stepped in defies rationality.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, I believe you missed an additional difference which makes the Solyndra fiasco worse.</p><p>The federal government loaned Solyndra money primarily BECAUSE private equity would not.</p><p>Solyndra could not longer tempt private capital. Numerous potential private investors stepped forward to say that 10 minutes with Solyndra&#8217;s prospectus was all that was needed to see why their offering failed. That the government stepped in defies rationality.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ned Netterville</title><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2011/09/26/is-paul-krugman-stupid-or-just-dishonest/#comment-2054</link> <dc:creator>Ned Netterville</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:37:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=9225#comment-2054</guid> <description><![CDATA[&quot;Is Paul Krugman stupid, or just dishonest?&quot;Both.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is Paul Krugman stupid, or just dishonest?&#8221;</p><p>Both.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave Eave</title><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2011/09/26/is-paul-krugman-stupid-or-just-dishonest/#comment-2053</link> <dc:creator>Dave Eave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:18:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=9225#comment-2053</guid> <description><![CDATA[I think between Paul Krugman and Robert Reich, the level of economic heresy and political hackery has never been higher.These whackos are given a national podium in the NY Times and NPR to espouse the merits of policies that have continuously failed, left economies, countries and entire nations in ruin, most recently in Japan, but mirrored in the past crashes of South America, Eastern Europe, the USSR, South Asia and Even here in America.These people are more dangerous than disingenuous idiots, they are shills for the perpetuation of failed Keynesian policies that leave bureaucrats and bankers in charge of the fate of the nation. These people need a good tar n&#039; feathering.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think between Paul Krugman and Robert Reich, the level of economic heresy and political hackery has never been higher.</p><p>These whackos are given a national podium in the NY Times and NPR to espouse the merits of policies that have continuously failed, left economies, countries and entire nations in ruin, most recently in Japan, but mirrored in the past crashes of South America, Eastern Europe, the USSR, South Asia and Even here in America.</p><p>These people are more dangerous than disingenuous idiots, they are shills for the perpetuation of failed Keynesian policies that leave bureaucrats and bankers in charge of the fate of the nation. These people need a good tar n&#8217; feathering.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wirkman</title><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2011/09/26/is-paul-krugman-stupid-or-just-dishonest/#comment-2052</link> <dc:creator>Wirkman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 07:23:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=9225#comment-2052</guid> <description><![CDATA[The big difference is that in government, politicians and bureaucrats decide how to spend and risk other people&#039;s money without their consent. In private enterprise, people consent to the level of risk they take when they invest.For Krugman not to see that diference suggests a level of carelessness not attributable to ideology. He strikes me as simply a &quot;bad man.&quot;]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big difference is that in government, politicians and bureaucrats decide how to spend and risk other people&#8217;s money without their consent. In private enterprise, people consent to the level of risk they take when they invest.</p><p>For Krugman not to see that diference suggests a level of carelessness not attributable to ideology. He strikes me as simply a &#8220;bad man.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mickey Hobart</title><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2011/09/26/is-paul-krugman-stupid-or-just-dishonest/#comment-2051</link> <dc:creator>Mickey Hobart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 06:10:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=9225#comment-2051</guid> <description><![CDATA[You say it rather strongly, but you have a good point. Also, thanks for the Coyote link.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say it rather strongly, but you have a good point. Also, thanks for the Coyote link.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>