Should Parents Need a License to Procreate? A Moron Says Yes.

by on September 2, 2010 @ 9:31 am · 0 comments

in Corporatism, Nanny Statism, Victimless Crimes

Hugh LaFollette, “Licensing Parents Revisited,” Journal of Applied Philosophy.1

The premise of his article is that the legitimacy of professional licensing is well-established and the practice should be expanded to parents.

While one could argue that it doesn’t follow from professional licensing being applied to various professions that it should be expanded to parents, this article is really illustrative of why libertarians should oppose professional licensure outright.

It’s a slippery slope from licensing florists to licensing parents, be it for procreation or raising children after the fact.2 Once you concede the legitimacy of some licensing, then more outrageous nonsense inevitably follows.

Notes

  1. Anytime you see the words “applied philosophy” or “applied ethics” together and the article isn’t written by a libertarian, it is safe to assume it contains some nonsense like environmental socialism, Big Brother or nanny statist stuff like this or national health care or other social-welfare programs, calls for government to make businesses more socially responsible, and so on. []
  2. No offense, my home state of Louisiana. Why we need to be protected from bad floral arrangements is beyond me. What professional licensing is really about is restricting competition in order to protect existing players in the market; which, not incidentally, is what the state-granted monopoly privilege called intellectual property is about too. Licensing procreation will effectively be a eugenics program. And requiring a license to parent will amount to a massive social engineering project controlled by the politically-connected few. []
About Geoffrey Allan Plauché (74 Posts)

Geoffrey is an Aristotelian-Liberal political philosopher, an adjunct instructor for Buena Vista University, the founder and executive editor of Prometheus Unbound: A Libertarian Review of Fiction and Literature, and the webmaster of The Libertarian Standard. His work has appeared in Libertarian Papers, the Journal of Libertarian Studies, the Journal of Value Inquiry, and Transformers and Philosophy. He lives in Edgewood, KY with his wife and two children.


{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

Comment Policy

Please keep the following in mind when commenting:
  • Real names preferred but not required.
  • If your comment contains several links, your comment may be held up in moderation; please, be patient.
  • Strive for the ideal speech situation: civility, mutual understanding, no eristic debating tactics, no ad hominems.
  • So long as the comments are not overrun by spammers, trolls, and general incivility, registration will not be required to comment.
  • We reserve the right to delete or mark comments as SPAM, and to moderate or ban abusive commenters, at our discretion.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

{ 3 trackbacks }

  • Geoffrey Plauche

    RT @libstandard: New post: The Libertarian Standard » Should Parents Need a License to Procreate? A Moron Says Yes. | http://bit.ly/dgcjSZ

    September 2, 2010
  • LibertarianMinds

    Should Parents Need a License to Procreate? A Moron Says Yes. http://ff.im/-q77pH

    September 2, 2010
  • Benjamin B.

    Wer Kinder kriegen will, soll eine Lizenz dafür benötigen, so lautet der Vorschlag eines 'praktischen Philosophen'. - http://bit.ly/csiscx

    September 2, 2010

Previous post:

Next post: