<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/" > <channel><title>Comments on: CrunchGear vs. the Tea Party on Net Neutrality</title> <atom:link href="http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/08/13/crunchgear-vs-the-tea-party-on-net-neutrality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/08/13/crunchgear-vs-the-tea-party-on-net-neutrality/</link> <description>Property - Prosperity - Peace</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:54:19 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: Pirate-slaying censorship bill, COICA, gets unanimous support</title><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/08/13/crunchgear-vs-the-tea-party-on-net-neutrality/#comment-1341</link> <dc:creator>Pirate-slaying censorship bill, COICA, gets unanimous support</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:32:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=4081#comment-1341</guid> <description><![CDATA[[...] Update: On TWIT 275 Leo Laporte and his guest hosts discuss and rightly criticize COICA. One of the guest hosts, Zadi Diaz, joins in the criticism of COICA, and then says &#8220;this is why we need net neutrality.&#8221; This shows just how confused non-libertarians can be about property rights and the role and nature of the state. Consider: she is concerned about the baleful effects of regulations, laws, and controls created and enforced against private individuals and companies by the untrustworthy state; and to combat this, she suggests that the state should impose regulations on private companies and the Internet! Net neutrality legislation is a bad, and unlibertarian, idea. (See my posts A Libertarian Take on Net Neutrality and Net Neutrality Developments, and Geoffrey Allan Plauché, CrunchGear vs. the Tea Party on Net Neutrality.) [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: On TWIT 275 Leo Laporte and his guest hosts discuss and rightly criticize COICA. One of the guest hosts, Zadi Diaz, joins in the criticism of COICA, and then says &#8220;this is why we need net neutrality.&#8221; This shows just how confused non-libertarians can be about property rights and the role and nature of the state. Consider: she is concerned about the baleful effects of regulations, laws, and controls created and enforced against private individuals and companies by the untrustworthy state; and to combat this, she suggests that the state should impose regulations on private companies and the Internet! Net neutrality legislation is a bad, and unlibertarian, idea. (See my posts A Libertarian Take on Net Neutrality and Net Neutrality Developments, and Geoffrey Allan Plauché, CrunchGear vs. the Tea Party on Net Neutrality.) [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gplauche</title><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/08/13/crunchgear-vs-the-tea-party-on-net-neutrality/#comment-844</link> <dc:creator>gplauche</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 00:30:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=4081#comment-844</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @libstandard: New blogpost: The Libertarian Standard » CrunchGear vs. the Tea Party on Net Neutrality &#124; http://bit.ly/cQ0a3e&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @libstandard: New blogpost: The Libertarian Standard » CrunchGear vs. the Tea Party on Net Neutrality | <a href="http://bit.ly/cQ0a3e" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cQ0a3e</a></span></span></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CrunchGear vs. the Tea Party on Net Neutrality &#8212; Geoffrey Allan Plauché</title><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/08/13/crunchgear-vs-the-tea-party-on-net-neutrality/#comment-843</link> <dc:creator>CrunchGear vs. the Tea Party on Net Neutrality &#8212; Geoffrey Allan Plauché</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:55:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=4081#comment-843</guid> <description><![CDATA[[...] Cross-posted at The Libertarian Standard. [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cross-posted at The Libertarian Standard. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Geoffrey Allan Plauché</title><link>http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/08/13/crunchgear-vs-the-tea-party-on-net-neutrality/#comment-841</link> <dc:creator>Geoffrey Allan Plauché</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:15:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=4081#comment-841</guid> <description><![CDATA[An interesting post by Dan Frommer of Business Insider: &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessinsider.com/heres-whats-missing-from-all-the-net-neutrality-blather-nothing-bad-is-going-to-happen-if-net-neutrality-dies-2010-8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s What&#039;s Missing From All The Net Neutrality Blather: Nothing Bad Is Going To Happen If Net Neutrality Dies&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting post by Dan Frommer of Business Insider: &#8220;<a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/heres-whats-missing-from-all-the-net-neutrality-blather-nothing-bad-is-going-to-happen-if-net-neutrality-dies-2010-8" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s What&#8217;s Missing From All The Net Neutrality Blather: Nothing Bad Is Going To Happen If Net Neutrality Dies</a>.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>