Comments on: Not One But Two Sprinklers Per Tree http://libertarianstandard.com/2010/06/27/not-one-but-two-sprinklers-per-tree/ Property - Prosperity - Peace Mon, 20 May 2013 06:54:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Manuel Lorahttp://libertarianstandard.com/2010/06/27/not-one-but-two-sprinklers-per-tree/#comment-566 Manuel Lora Mon, 28 Jun 2010 05:21:02 +0000 http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=2794#comment-566 RT @libstandard: New blogpost: The Libertarian Standard » Not One But Two Sprinklers Per Tree | http://bit.ly/dyGiTU

]]> By: Manuel Lorahttp://libertarianstandard.com/2010/06/27/not-one-but-two-sprinklers-per-tree/#comment-568 Manuel Lora Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:42:07 +0000 http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=2794#comment-568 Heh. Actually the trees are rather large so one sprinkler seems that either would have been not sufficient to get both sides, or, to get both sides, would have used a lot of water just to get around the root. Thus, two small, quietly misting sprinklers does the job quite well.

]]> By: Wirkman Virkkalahttp://libertarianstandard.com/2010/06/27/not-one-but-two-sprinklers-per-tree/#comment-567 Wirkman Virkkala Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:35:15 +0000 http://libertarianstandard.com/?p=2794#comment-567 What would Thorstein Veblen say?

Seems like two SMALL sprinklers is INCONSPICUOUS consumption, to me, and far more effective than hiring a Mexican with a watering can.

]]>